Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
4.
Arch Med Res ; 51(6): 572-573, 2020 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-141598

RESUMEN

A TV debate in April 2020 between two French doctors regarding the benefits of testing a coronavirus vaccine in Africa where there are no masks or treatments available has led to international criticism. This case highlights a problematic ethical double standard in multinational clinical research: trials that would be considered unethical in high income countries (e.g., placebo-controlled where there is an existing treatment) are nonetheless justified in low-and-middle-income countries because the existing standards of care are less (i.e., no access to a treatment). Underlying this ethical double standard in some multinational clinical trials is a moral imperialism and persistent colonialist thinking that must be rejected.


Asunto(s)
Ensayos Clínicos como Asunto/ética , Infecciones por Coronavirus/diagnóstico , Infecciones por Coronavirus/prevención & control , Ética en Investigación , Pandemias/prevención & control , Neumonía Viral/diagnóstico , Neumonía Viral/prevención & control , Vacunas Virales/uso terapéutico , África , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , Vacunas contra la COVID-19 , Colonialismo , Países en Desarrollo , Relativismo Ético , Francia , Experimentación Humana/ética , Humanos , Obligaciones Morales , Equipo de Protección Personal , Sujetos de Investigación , SARS-CoV-2
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA